Friday, 10 February 2017

Kunst-Werke (KW) Institute for Contemporary Art

On Day 3 we visit the Kunst-Werke (KW) Institute for Contemporary Art located in Scheunenviertel (‘Barn Quarter’) is one of Berlin's oldest neighbourhoods.  KW was founded shortly after the fall of the Berlin Wall by Klaus Biesenbach and a group of young art enthusiasts in a practically derelict former margarine factory in Berlin-Mitte in the early 1990s.  Labelling  itself as a collaborative creation space rather than a gallery, the KW presents shows that are dynamic and inspirational, and prepared by emerging and established artists working with diverse media.

Image courtesy of see-berlin.de


In contrast to Day 2's gallery visit to Hamburger Bahnhoff, KW's philosophy is that without a permanent collection, it can be more readily responsive to artistic innovation and to creative programming.

A new artistic team was appointed at the KW last year, coming from different countries around the world the team will work on projects with artists that will be exhibited at the museum and around the city of Berlin.  The new director, Krist Gruijthuijsen, envisions the art space as a community hub, one that fosters a mutual exchange between artist and audience.

KW currently has a solo exhibition by South African conceptual artist, Ian Wilson, and is one of their key reference points for the new year. Wilson has been exploring the aesthetic potential of spoken language since the late 1960s and serves as a framework for exploring roles of language, communication, and the broader significance of interaction between human beings. The exhibition is in constant flux and changes gradually throughout the course of its duration. Wilson’s early paintings and sculptures are physical objects, however, they also signal an inclination to take reduction and abstraction a step further, to the point of ridding art of physical properties altogether.

Ian Wilson, Circle on the floor, 1968, Installation view Ian Wilson at the Galerie Mot & Van den Boogaard, Brussels, 1998, Courtesy the artist and Jan Mot, Brussels
Alongside Wilson's exhibition is the first institutional solo exhibition from Hanne Lippard. Lippard's artistic medium is her voice,  speaking uncomfortable truths with a voice dripping with comfort: composed, considered, articulate and calming. In response to Wilson, Lippard conceived a new production titled Flesh, an immersive installation, which takes up the entire ground floor hall of the KW building and confronts the visitor with one singular element—a spiral staircase. When ascending the stairs, one enters an awkwardly shaped space that incorporates the upper windows of the ceiling as a point of view outside of the exhibition hall. The newly created space is emerged by the artist’s voice, which slowly directs the audience towards a world where the meaning of language is being shaped, structured and categorised. Like Wilson, Lippard uses her body and words to counterfeit perimeters given by established standards in art production and creates a universe where the audience is physically as well as mentally brought outside of their confinements.

Image courtesy of KW Institute for Contemporary Art

Saturday, 4 February 2017

Hamburger Bahnhof - Berlin's Museum for Contemporary Art

On Day 2 of our visit to Berlin we will be visiting the Hamburger Bahnhof - Museum für Gegenwart or Berlin's Museum for Contemporary Art - on Invalidenstrasse in the Moabit district.

Image courtsey of Top 10 Berlin.

The museum opened as an art gallery in 1996 and has a comprehensive collection of contemporary art with a variety of exhibitions. The museum’s name refers to the building’s original function as one of the first terminal stations of the rail system in Germany. It opened as the terminus of the railway line between Hamburg and Berlin in December 1846. The building’s late Neoclassical style was conceived by the architect and railway pioneer, Friedrich Neuhaus. It set an architectural precedent for the subsequent designs of Berlin’s train stations through the second half of the 19th century. For forty years it served as the terminal between Hamburg and Berlin until it was closed in 1884.

After modernisation in 1906 the old railway station opened as the Museum of Transport and Construction. In 1943 however, during the Second World War, the building sustained severe damage and in the subsequent division of Germany, it remained unused for decades, located as it was in the no-man’s land between East and West Berlin.

Historische Aufnahme des Hamburger Bahnhofs, um 1860 © bpk. Image courtesy of Staatliche Museen zu Berlin

Years later, after lengthy reconstruction and modernisation by architect Josef Paul Kleihues, the Hamburger Bahnhof reopened on 2 November 1996 as a museum of contemporary art. The museum expanded significantly to accommodate the Friedrich Christian Flick Collection, presented to the museum in 2004 as a long-term loan. The former dispatch warehouses located behind the main building were renovated by the architectural firm Kuehn Malvezzi and connected to the historical building via a passage. The resulting structures, which became known as Rieckhallen, nearly doubled the available exhibition space. Today the Nationalgalerie’s Hamburger Bahnhof division is one of the largest public collections of contemporary art in the world.

Like other contemporary art galleries in other major cities, the Hamberger Bahnhof is a destination in itself, with a rich history and stunning architechtural features such as the addition of lighting installations by American artist Dan Flavin, which highlight the architectural elements of the building, bringing a touch of 20th century edginess without marring its 19th century beauty.

Josef Paul Kleihues's redesign of the building could be compared to Gae Eulenti's transformation of the 1900 Beaux Arts Gare d’Orsay train station, a spectacular landmark originally designed by Victor Laloux, into the Musée d’Orsay, a museum of mainly French art from 1848 to 1915.

As part of the redesign she created a grand central aisle in a cavernous space that once contained train tracks under a dramatic barrel-vaulted glass ceiling. Original support beams were highlighted, and new industrial materials like wire mesh were used. Walls were redone in rough stone.

The renovated building was opened in December 1986, and critical reaction was mixed. Holland Cotter of The New York Times called it “fabulously eccentric.” But Libération, a French newspaper favored by art specialists and critics, said the museum had been “likened to a funeral hall, to a tomb, to a mausoleum, to an Egyptian burial monument, to a necropolis.”

The work on show at Hamburger Bahnhof Museum comes predominantly from three collections, which are permanently on loan to the museum; it houses the private collection of Erich Marx, which includes works by Andy Warhol, Cy Twombly, Robert Rauschenberg, Roy Lichtenstein, Anselm Kiefer and Joseph Beuys; an extensive collection from Friedrich Christian Flick, not without its controversies from his grandfather, Friedrich Flick, the arms manufacturer and steel magnate who used to supply the Nazi regime; and Egidio Marzona, which primarily consists of works of American and European Conceptual art, Minimal Art, and Arte Povera.

Key artworks in this museum include:

Andy Warhol, Chairman Mao, 1975

Starting in the early 1970s, the Pop artist made hundreds of images of Mao, using a portrait of the leader from the Little Red Book, a propaganda collection of Mao’s speeches and quotations from the Cultural Revolution, as his template. Warhol’s Maos are endlessly varied—ferocious, parodic, and beautiful—gestures of paint smeared onto the reproduced outline of the Chinese leader’s head and shoulders.

A print of Andy Warhol's famous portrait of Chairman Mao Zedong on display at the Hamburger Bahnhof art museum in Berlin. Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.

Anslem Kiefer, Volkszählung, 1991

Volkszählung is a huge sculpture of steel and lead that depicts a freestanding library, some fifteen feet tall, whose huge books, made of lead, are pocked with hundreds of dried peas in reference to the bean counters (“Erbsenzähler”) responsible for the project of counting human beings that reduces them to numbers. It was created in the aftermath of a controversial census in what was then West Germany.  Kiefer intentionally used lead to contrast heavy and light, fixity and movement (Brockmeier, J., 2015).

Image courtesy of the New Media Observatory

Joseph Beuys, End of the Twentieth Century, 1983

Das Ende des 20. Jahrhunderts (The End of the 20th Century) consists of nine large basalt blocks which are strewn like dead bodies through the gallery space. The work looks unfinished: one block is still lying on a trolley as if it is still being moved in, though in reality it has been deliberately left in a state of incompletion by the artist thirty one years ago. Each basalt block has a cavity drilled in it, each cavity is lined with felt and mud, and has a cone shaped piece of stone driven into it. You can feel the concrete floor of the gallery about to collapse under the weight of these blocks, they have a presence that can be felt like the deep rumbling of a passing train. The industrial trolley testifies to the labour exerted in their arrangement.

Image courtesy of Visit Berlin.

Robert Rauschenberg, Pink Door, 1954


Rauschenberg was an American painter and graphic artist whose early works anticipated the pop art movement. He is well known for his "Combines" of the 1950s, in which non-traditional materials and objects were employed in innovative combinations. Rauschenberg was both a painter and a sculptor and the Combines are a combination of both, but he also worked with photography, printmaking, papermaking, and performance.

Image courtesy of Black Mountain.

Thursday, 26 January 2017

Fernsehturm, Alexanderplatz, Berlin

On our first day of the trip to Berlin in February, as well as getting on a flight in the very small hours of the morning, we will be visiting Fernsehturm in Alexanderplatz.

Image courtesy of berlinperspectivesonarchitecture.com

In the early 1950s, the German Democratic Republic (GDR) planned to build a new facility in Berlin intended primarily for the broadcast of GDR television programmes.  The Fernsehturm (television tower in English) was built in Alexanderplatz and commissioned by Government Leader Walter Ulbricht, who aimed to demonstrate the superiority of socialist societies.  The tower would dominate the skyline and construction showed that a better future was being built in the East.

The original design of the slender tower was devised by the GDR architect Hermann Henselmann. The sphere at the top of the tower was intended to remind people of the Soviet sputnik satellites and was to light up red, the colour of socialism.

The tower was constructed between 1965 and 1969 with only one method considered for constructing it, a method known as “climbing formwork”. The internal steel frame is built first and then the external concrete shaft is built around it.  Mounting the sphere at a height of 200m presented the engineers with a challenge.  The load-bearing steel frame of the sphere was initially precast on the ground and the segments were heaved up using cranes and then secured on the circular platform which forms the final section of the concrete shaft.

The Fernsehturm was also nicknamed "the Pope's revenge" because when the sun shines on the metal skin of the sphere, the reflected light creates the shape of a cross. This was quite unfortunate for the the atheist foundations of the communist GDR government.  Former US President Ronald Reagan once said in a speech that the GDR tried as hard as they could to get rid of the light cross, but without success, the Christian symbol continued to shine on the GDR’s power tower.

Sunlight cross in the Fernsehturm Berlin, and the cross of the Berlin Dome aside, Patricio.lorente, 2015.

At 368 metres tall, the Fernsehturm is the highest publicly accessible building in Europe with  more than a million visitors from 86 countries going up to the observational level with it's breathtaking views of the bustling and constantly changing city of Berlin.

Sunday, 22 January 2017

The Lives of Others Film Review

I am currently studying an MA in Creative Enterprise with Management and Arts at the University of Reading.  This term I am doing an International Study Visit module, and we are going to Berlin in February reading week.

One of my aims for the trip is to research further how art is used to depict events that have happened in Berlin and how this has had an affect on the viewers.  In preparation for the module we have a list of films we can choose from that are related to Berlin:

  • Aeon Flux, Karyn Kusama, 2005
  • Berlin Alexanderplatz, Rainer Werner Fassbinder, 1980.
  • Cabaret, Bob Fosse, 1972.
  • We Children From Bahnhof Zoo, Christiane F – Wir Kinder From Bahnhof Zoo, Uli Edel, 1981.
  • Deutschland 83, Anna & Jeorg Winger, 2015.
  • Downfall, Oliver Hirschbiegel, 2004.
  • Funeral in Berlin, Guy Hamilton, 1966.
  • Germany Year Zero, Roberto Rossellini, 1948
  • Goodbye, Lenin!, Wolfgang Becker, 2003
  • One, Two, Three, Billy Wilder, 1961
  • People on Sunday (Menschen am Sonntag), Curt and Robert Siodmak, 1930
  • Rosenstrasse, Margarethe von Trotta, 2003.
  • Run Lola Run, Tom Tykwer, 1998
  • The Lives of Others (Das Leben der Anderen), Florian Henckel von
  • The Spy Who Came In From The Cold, Martin Ritt, 1965.
  • The Mysteries of Berlin, Cordelia Swann, 1979-82.
  • The Bourne Supremacy, Paul Greengrass, 2004
  • Wings of Desire (Der Himmel über Berlin), Wim Wenders, 1987
I chose The Lives of Others, released in 2007, and directed by Florian Henckel von Donnersmarck, an award-winning political thriller set in 1980s East Germany.  Captain Wiesler (pictured below) works for the Stasi, the secret police, and is asked to keep surveillance on a playwright, Georg Dreyman, whose loyalty to the party is under question.  Wiesler arranges arranges for every wall and floor surface of Dreyman's apartment to be threaded with wires, tapped so that, while perched in an upstairs attic, he can listen out for evidence of treachery.  During the surveillance Weisler is slowly drawn into Dreyman's life and begins to question his own ideals.

Image from bbc.co.uk

The film starts with Wiesler teaching a group of students in interrogation techniques.  The captive had been kept awake for many hours and had started to become upset.  Wiesler ignores the emotion being heard from the recording and listens instead to the precise use of language to indicate guilt, advising that an innocent person would be angry and protest, whereas a guilty one sticks to their story and cries at the inevitability of being caught in a lie.

Wiesler's demeanour is very impassive, quietly taking in other peoples' actions, assessing them through his many years of experience as a Stasi officer.  As the film progresses, his detachment weakens.  He becomes thoroughly absorbed in the lives of Dreyman and his girlfriend actress, Christa-Maria Sieland, drawing out their apartment layout in the surveillance room and following them around the rooms, even mimicking them cuddled up in bed.

The film sets themselves are very bland in colouring, as is the functional clothing worn by the characters, reflecting the utilitarian nature of East Germany at that time.  When the Berlin Wall finally comes down there is a shift towards more colour in the scenes and more fashionable clothing.

It is hard to imagine the level of control on peoples' lives when living in East Germany, the daily fears and suspicions they would have endured.  The Lives of Others depicts some of this feeling, however I thought some parts of the story were not covered in detail, and it is only from my additional research into the film that I now understand what it was trying to achieve.  This may be down to the film being subtitled and so the viewer has to concentrate on reading the translation rather than being able to freely watch the action on the screen. I also found that I may have projected feelings onto the actors; I kept waiting for Wiesler to condem Dreyman with the information he had gathered on him based on the first scene of the film and my understanding of the regime, but Wiesler turns out to be a saviour and protector when Dreyman is investigated by the Stasi.  A part of me then wanted the film to be based on a true story, however, a Guardian article from 2007 by Anna Funder, advises this could never have happened:

"The thoroughness of the regime was horrifying: it accumulated, in the 40 years of its existence, more written records than in all of German history since the Middle Ages. East Germany was run on fear and betrayal: at least one in 50 people - by CIA estimates, one in seven - were informing on their relatives, friends, neighbours and colleagues. People were horrified to discover what had happened, again, in their country; what human beings were capable of."
I am interested in finding out more about the time just before the fall of the Berlin Wall, and just afterwards, how it affected peoples' lives and how artists portrayed these events.  This will be the focus of some of my future research for this module.

Image from IMP Awards, 2007

Monday, 16 January 2017

The Great Wide Open

Following on from my personal photography project last year, Looking Into The Depths, that explored the impacts humankind are having on the environment, particularly the oceans, I have found that other issue-based photography or films capture my attention much more than they previously may have done.  I pay particular attention to the visual narratives being created, comparing their techniques with those I aimed to portray in my project to caution my audience of the effects of our actions.

My objective was to create beautiful images that confused the viewer so that they took a second look at the photograph and questioned what wasn't quite right about it.

























As I was scrolling through the National Geographic Instagram feed the other day, I came across a post of Jared Leto's Great Wide Open videos made last year to celebrate America's National Parks and the incredible adventurers who explore its beauty.  Leto is described as an actor, musician, entrepreneur and environmentalist, and so I had to take a look at the videos to see if there was any link to preserving the National Parks.  However, rather than focusing on the environmental aspect, these videos tell the stories of the people who choose to push themselves to the limit through extreme rock climbing.  Rather than focusing on destruction and ruin, the Great Wide Open emphasises the stunning expanses and wilderness to be found in the National Parks, and the experiences felt by the people who visit them.

The fourth video in the series, The Wolfman, has to be my favourite.  It tells us about the wild animals found in Yosemite National Park and features interviews with more normal people than the fearsome rock climbers, showing that it appeals to all people from all walks of life, and the haven that it offers them, and the wildlife.

They are beautiful videos telling stories of how the parks have had an influence on the lives of the central characters and the sense of wanderlust to be found in this wilderness.  I like to think that seeing the beauty and benefits the parks bring to these people will influence others to take more care of the environments they encounter.